Mac Pro is not making Windows workstation folks nervous




(Picture debt: Apple)

Considering that its own beginning till the launch of its personal Silicon, the Macintosh Pro was actually Apple’s fastest pc and also proceeds this mood of success till currently. Even more folks have an interest in Apple’s very most costly item than in its own smaller sized brother or sister, the Macintosh Center. That might involve alter after the most up to date refresh that viewed the Macintosh Pro and also the Macintosh Center acquire specifically the exact same elements along with the only considerable variation being actually the growth capacity of the Macintosh Pro (together with a so much more highly effective PSU) and also a considerably greater cost.

The future of the Macintosh Pro, being one of the most effective workstations around, rests on what to construct from that function; the Macintosh Pro is actually the only Apple item that may be customized article acquisition however reviewed to previous productions where you could possibly switch the GPU, SSD, moment components and so on, the brand-new Apple Silicon Macintosh Pro is actually truly minimal. 

You can’t plug in a GPU (or even an exterior GPU for that after) and also Apple seems to be to become satisfied that you don’t need to plug in its own $2,000 accelerator card. Its press release even promotes it as a freebie, saying Now every Mac Pro has the performance of not just one but seven Afterburner cards built in. That also presumably applies to the Mac Studio.

Apple’s use cases include DSP cards, SDI I/O cards as well as storage and networking: a look at the cards listed in the keynote confirms this.

From left to right: there’s a Sonnet Fusion Dual U.2 (storage), the OWC Accelsior 8M2 (storage), the AVID HDX PCIe card, an AJA Kona 5 card, a Lynx Studio Technology E22 PCI Express Card, a Blackmagic Decklink 8K Pro capture card and two ATTO NIC cards. (Image credit: Apple)

Mac Pro to die of a slow death?

I reached out to two experts from Puget Systems, a boutique PC workstation vendor to comment on the Mac Pro announcement. Even if they compete with Apple for a share of the workstation pie and their views may reflect some bias, both point out to what looks like obvious shortcomings.

Apple specifically calls out rendering performance in Octane, Redshift and Blender in the keynote and, according to Kelly Shipman, the company’s resident hardware expert, the lack of GPU support is very limiting for rendering. 

“The 192GB shared memory is nice for extremely large scenes, but if the scene is that large, then it will also need a significant amount of computational power to render quickly. Because the new M2 Ultra is essentially two M2 Max working as one, we can look at public results from Blender and Redshift to get a sense of how they compare.” He noted.

“In Blender, a 38 core M2 Max has a score of 1900, so the M2 Ultra should be just shy of 4000. This puts it in range of an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, while an RTX 4090 is 13,000. A similar story can be seen in Redshift where the predicted render time will be 4 minutes, roughly in the 3070 range, while a 4090 is just 1 minute.

3D applications have been putting in a lot of effort to get their renderers onto OSX, but Apple has chosen to step away from GPU support

Matt Back, Puget Systems

However, because the Mac Pro does not support additional GPUs, the system cannot be upgraded to a faster render, and cannot benefit from having multiple GPUs in the same system. The previous Mac Pros allowed for multiple GPUs giving artists ways to improve their render times. This is unfortunate as many of these 3D applications have been putting in a lot of effort to get their renderers onto OSX, but Apple has chosen to step away from GPU support.”

And that’s one aspect worth dwelling on: The last Intel-based Mac Pro was launched four years ago and we cannot predict when the next one will be unveiled. The Mac Studio has, seemingly, embraced a yearly refresh cadence. So should creative professionals stick to the current Mac Pro, knowing that they may or may not be in a position to upgrade next year or just bite the bullet and move to the far cheaper Mac Studio and change every year?

I believe (and it is a sentiment shared with other in the industry) that the Mac Studio is going to be more popular as Apple eliminates any core component differentiation. As Matt Bach, from Puget Systems puts it, “Without GPU support, I honestly do not really know what you would use all the PCIe slots for on the Macintosh Pro”.

Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!

Désiré possesses been musing and writing about technology during a career spanning four decades. He dabbled in website builders and web hosting when DHTML and frames were in vogue and started narrating about the impact of technology on society only before the start of the Y2K hysteria at the turn of the final millennium.

Source

Related Post

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

Read More