Assessment is not always an ‘either/or’

Photo by Soda North on Pexels.com

Do you constantly associate the Western education as more formative-focused and student-centred while the Eastern education as more teacher-centred and summative-focused? This is a typical belief amongst instructional scientists, designers and basic academics around the world. In our brand-new post in Teaching in Higher Education , we check out whether this belief is true in a location such as Hong Kong, a Confucian-influenced culture.

Hong Kong is distinct in itself since of its fascinating history (a neighborhood affected by the Confucian culture and was when a British nest and for that reason brings both the conventional Chinese and British cultures) and its civilisations/globalisations. Many individuals particularly in the college labor force (consisting of among us) are affected by both the Eastern and western cultures, such as maturing in Hong Kong and having actually gotten education in some Western nations then going back to Hong Kong to work. From released literature and our experience/observation, instructors in Hong Kong do not constantly operate in the summative-focused and teacher-centred mode. Instructors in Western cultures likewise do not constantly work in the formative-focused and student-centred mode. Education and evaluation need to not be an either/or operation, as in the sharp summative/formative binary, however rethought in more holistic and intricate methods.

We were for that reason interested to check out the experiences and understandings of Assessment for Learning amongst trainees, instructors and supervisors in a Confucian-influenced culture, and to see how they articulated the connections in between evaluation and knowing. We talk to numerous stakeholders to collect their thorough understandings and experiences on evaluation and particularly the idea Assessment for Learning. In contrast to the typical belief explained at the start, our individuals value the essential ideas of Assessment for Learning, such as utilizing genuine evaluation and feedback to help with knowing. They are more formative-focused and student-centred than what we had actually initially believed.

However, our individuals at all stakeholder levels appear to ‘‘ patriotically’ abide by the gold requirement of standard evaluations. Since standard assessment has a long history that stems from the ancient Chinese empire, this is not unanticipated. We should be careful of this unacknowledged predisposition as instructors with entirely the Western background might likewise adhere to standard evaluation due to the fact that it is simply a dominant discourse in any education. What interests us remains in reality the twin problems –– that stakeholders think in the knowing function of evaluation while they likewise see the benefit of or the requirement for utilizing conventional evaluations since conventional assessments are gold requirement. They seem operating along the continuum rather of inhabiting an either/or position. Simply put, the summative/formative binary doesn’’ t hold in this specific context. This finding reveals there is prospective to develop on the knowing function of evaluation however it is inadequate in itself without the higher evaluation literacy. Educators appear to do not have the resources to think about other evaluation options that are more in tuned with Assessment for Learning.

And so we refer this situation as an absence of evaluation literacy. They might be able to break away from the existing gold requirement and propose or produce another gold requirement if stakeholders are more evaluation literate. The individuals in this research study reveal a number of fantastic evaluation techniques, however regrettably without their own realisation that those are great methods. These findings open chances to support evaluation literacy in an useful method. We propose that college organizations can utilize policies and structures that are holistic which concentrate on the knowing function of evaluation in order to empower stakeholders to accept Assessment for Learning. We argue that this finding is not just helpful for college contexts in the Confucian-influenced culture however likewise non-Confucian-influenced, as this twin concern of dedication to the knowing function of evaluation and dedication to conventional evaluations does not just exist in the previous.

Doris Chong and Jan McArthur (Lancaster University).