Inhabiting borders: autoethnographic reflections of PhD students in Colombia

After seeing the call for documents for Teaching in Higher Education’’ s newest unique concern , we believed that we need to send out a proposition to take part in this problem. Since we understood that we have the possibility of making a contribution from the crossway of different under-represented positions, that is. The concentrate on ‘‘ borderlands ’ captivated us, since we, certainly, perform our scholastic activities in borderlands and among our objectives was revealing the functions of our borderlands. Our position is formed by the context, along with by our subjectivities and practices.

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

Various aspects of the context and the practices find us in ‘‘ borderlands ’, which typically lead to invisibilization and exemption. Lots of PhD trainees from the North Atlantic academy do not handle the very same problems that form our day-to-day lives and scholastic activities, hence, we believed that it is very important that an analysis of our experiences as PhD prospects in a Colombian public university is likewise consisted of as a post in this concern .

One component of the context is the violence. We study, teach, and perform research study in a violent context. This violence substantially impacts us. It forms our relationships, our practices, and our identities. Our university is regularly assaulted by the cops, and our associates and trainees are stigmatized. The education is disrupted numerous times every year due to clashes, strikes, or demonstrations. The environment is polarized. We are impacted by the violence once again when we leave the school for field research study. There are locations that we can not go since of the violence, there are individuals that we can not talk to, information that we can not gather, experiences that we can not hear. And when we carry out research study in these ‘‘ off-limit locations’ ’ working together with ‘‘ untouchable ’ topics, this suggests risk and stigmatization for partners in addition to the scientists. If we include the possibility of suffering a violent attack, burglary, or attack on our method to the university or throughout other sort of day-to-day activities, it is apparent that much of our practices are formed by the environment of violence.

Another aspect is neoliberalization. Despite the fact that neoliberalization impacts all scholastic organizations throughout the world, the level of the impacts is not the exact same. Colombia is impacted by neoliberalism to the level that the variety of PhD trainees that can devote their time to doctoral research studies is noticeably low. A lot of trainees have a full-time task (or numerous part-time tasks) due to absence of scholarships and on-campus working chances, which suggests that they do not have the time to be a part of a scholastic collectivity. Therefore, neoliberal policies in Colombia lead to extreme seclusion considering that the majority of us need to commit the majority of our time to operating in precarious conditions.

As an outcome, the ones who have scholarships feel guilty due to the fact that we see how difficult our coworkers are having a hard time simply to pay their costs, and we are likewise familiar with the reality that we reside in a nation struggling with severe hardship. It is tough to delight in the advantages of a scholarship when many people in Colombia battle to discover food and lodging, and there are more than 8 million individuals who have actually been displaced since of the armed dispute and living in dreadful conditions while being re-victimized every day by the Colombian state. Due to the defunding of the university it is difficult to money our research study activities, which requires us to customize our jobs for financial factors.

Our experiences are not just formed by the context however likewise by our subjectivities and practices. One example is performing transdisciplinary research study. Here, the concern is how we see ourselves as PhD trainees in a transdisciplinary program. This puts us in an ‘‘ in-between ’ location in relation to developed disciplines. We might carry out fieldwork through ethnography although we are not anthropologists; we might include components from social research studies of science although we are not professionals in this field. We might discover it needed to comprehend how our topic is related with gender theory and multispecies ethnography, however we might have been moving another scholastic topic for the last 2 or 3 years. Where are we? And even, what are we?

Finally, our practices of dealing with topics thought about ‘‘ other ’ s substantially impact us. We deal with native individuals, ladies, ethnic minorities, victims of the dispute, or non-human stars (such as plants or dead individuals). These practices suggest touching various type of subjectivities and experiences, which highly form our identities, intersectionalities, and ‘‘ borderlands ’ thatwe inhabit.

. Anzaldúa ’ s borderlands theory assists us to look for responses. Where are we? In-between areas. What are we? Border topics. A minimum of, this was what we contemplated after numerous virtual conferences we made where every one people shared her/his experiences about these concerns, about fieldwork in Colombia and its troubles, about being a PhD trainee in this nation, about not understanding where we are as scientists, and about a great deal of other concerns. We provide our short article in hoping that our reflections and experiences might intrigue others inhabiting ‘‘ borderlands ’ and handling comparable problems.

Serhat Tutkal, Valeria Busnelli, Isaura Castelao-Huerta, Fernanda Barbosa dos Santos, Luisa Fernanda Loaiza Orozco and Duván Rivera Arcila (Universidad Nacional de Colombia).